Compound comparison

TB-500 vs GLP3 · Reference Compound Comparison

Comparison of two larger synthetic peptide reference standards (>30 residues) that differ markedly in backbone modification strategy.

Shared characteristics

  • ·Both are synthetic peptides >30 residues in length
  • ·Both lyophilized to white-to-off-white powders
  • ·Both qualified at ≥99% purity by reversed-phase HPLC at 220 nm
  • ·Both confirmed by mass spectrometry against theoretical [M+H]+
  • ·Both ship with batch-specific COA

Side-by-side differences

AspectTB-500GLP3
Peptide length43 residues (acetylated)39 residues
Molecular weight4963.44 g/mol4731.4 g/mol
Backbone modificationN-terminal acetylationMultiple Aib substitutions
Sulfur-containing residues1 (Met6)None
Key labile siteMet sulfoxidationAggregation above ~5 mg/mL
ReconstitutionDirect in waterMild alkalinization for ≥5 mg/mL

When researchers choose each

TB-500 is the reference for studies on acetylated peptide fragments with methionine-driven oxidation chemistry. GLP3 is the reference for studies on Aib-stabilized longer peptides and receptor-binding analytics.