Compound comparison
GLOW Blend vs CJC/IPA Blend · Reference Comparison
Comparison of the two multi-peptide reference blends in our catalog. Each is a single-vial lyophilized mixture, but they differ in composition, total mass, and the chemistry of their components.
Shared characteristics
- ·Both supplied as single-vial lyophilized blends
- ·Each component qualified individually at ≥99% purity before blending
- ·Both reconstitute in bacteriostatic water
- ·Both ship with batch-specific COA documenting each component
Side-by-side differences
| Aspect | GLOW | CJC / IPA |
|---|---|---|
| Components | BPC-157 + TB-500 + GHK-Cu (3-way) | CJC-1295 (DAC) + Ipamorelin (2-way) |
| Total mass | 70 mg | 10 mg |
| Composition | 10 mg + 10 mg + 50 mg | 5 mg + 5 mg |
| Metal ion | Cu(II) in GHK-Cu component | None |
| Solution appearance | Faintly blue (Cu) | Clear, colorless |
| Special handling | Avoid chelators (EDTA, citrate) | Avoid reducing agents (DTT, βME) — DAC maleimide |
| Reconstitution volume | 3-5 mL | 2-3 mL |
When researchers choose each
GLOW is the broader-mass blend for protocols studying tissue-research compounds and copper-coordinated peptides together. CJC/IPA is the lower-mass, GH-axis-focused blend for studies pairing a 30-residue albumin-binding analog with a short pentapeptide secretagogue.
Order
GLOW Reference Blend
70mg vial · ≥99% purity
View product →
Order
CJC-1295 (DAC) + Ipamorelin Reference Blend
10mg vial · ≥99% purity
View product →
Research overview